Trump Makes Blockbuster Legal Move In Georgia Case - Fani Willis On Notice

Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and former

President Donald Trump has made a major legal move in his case in Georgia that

really knocked both the judge and Fannie Willis on their keisters with surprise

Before we get started please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe. I

know I ask those things a lot but they really do help us out and they help our

channel grow and spread our conservative message so it would really help. Trump

has made an official legal move. You know he's talked about this. He and his

attorneys have talked about this for a while but he's finally actually officially made the filing and he's filed to have Judge Chutkin removed

from the case and even CNN's Ellie Honing thinks that Trump has strong

standing. Now Ellie doesn't think it's gonna go anywhere and I have my doubts as well but his reasoning and the reasoning his attorneys gave actually

make sense and what his attorney said was look Judge Chutkin may in fact be

totally preparing to give former President Trump a fair trial. She may

want to give Trump a fair trial. In fact she may give Trump a fair trial but the

but here is is massive. No pun intended. The but here is she in other cases

essentially said she believed that Trump should be prosecuted and that he was

already guilty of assisting and and starting the January 6th insurrection and Trump's attorneys cited case files where she basically said things like

this. Well if you're going into court and the judge has already indicated that she

thinks you're guilty and that your prosecution is just, would you be

concerned that you were getting a fair trial? Now nobody here is casting aspersions on Judge Chutkin. She is a professional judge. She may very well say

I put my feelings aside. She has to deal a lot of cases. I put my feelings aside

and I just go by the case law and I just go by the case itself and I don't care

what my feelings are and that's actually not hard to believe. A judge has to do

it all the time. They must see cases all the time to make their blood boil but

they have to put their personal feelings aside so that actually wouldn't shock me

but it's the appearance that's the issue. The appearance of impropriety is so much

of a big deal in cases like this because people want to believe that the justice

system is fair, that there's not two separate tiers of justice, two separate

justice systems. The appearance here is horrible and I could see it going both

ways. If she makes a lot of calls against Trump and Trump is convicted people are

gonna say see she was against him the whole time, she already proclaimed him guilty, she was biased. But on the other side if she makes a lot of

decisions in Trump's favor or perceived to be in Trump's favor and Trump gets

acquitted I could see a lot of people on the left saying ah see she wanted to

prove she wasn't against Trump and so she overcompensated and ruined the case

I don't see how she could win in this scenario. To me she should be trying to

recuse herself because this seems like a no-win situation to me. I think she

gets nailed either way and I think it's from her own doing. I think she probably

shouldn't have made those statements in court but she did. They're there for the

for everybody to see. They're in the record. Anybody can see them. In fact you

can go to our website explainamerica.com, read the story on it and

you'll see them. So they're there. I just I don't see how she could continue at

this trial but let me know what you guys think in the comments. I really want to know do you think there should be a new trial? Should it be moved to federal

court? Should there be a new judge? What should happen? Should she recuse herself? Tell me what you think. Also again please remember to Like, Share and

Subscribe. Again that really helps us out. I'm Carmine Sabia. This is Explain

America. We love you guys. God bless you. Take care everybody