Trump Judge 'Required' To Recuse - NY Judge In Hot Water

Hey, ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia 4 Explain America

and the judge, Judge Juan Mershon in the New York trial right now that Alvin Bragg bought against former President Donald Trump

he may be required to get off that case. Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe

Those little things really help us out, and they help our channel continue to grow

Judge Juan Mershahn, according to one legal expert, should be required. to recuse himself from this case against Trump

and the reasons are obvious. The judge's daughter is financially enriched by people like Adam Schiff

by the Biden and Harris campaign and several other Democrat campaigns that use the firm she works for

for their campaigns. And these people, a lot of the fundraising they're doing

is off the Trump trials. One, just like the one Judge Mershan is overseeing

The conflict of interest is glaring. It's gigantic. It's massive. And in any other case in any other world a recusal would have to happen here But Mershon he desperate to stay on this case He wants to stay on this case He needs to stay on this case Now you may ask why Well here my opinion and it just my opinion

I believe Judge Mershahn wants to stay on this case to protect his daughter's financial interests

This judge's family is directly financially invested in this trial. How insane is that that would be like having a baseball umpire who you know bet on

on the game and he's still umpiring the game. He's got a vested financial interest or his daughter

bet on the game and you know it but you still allow him to umpire the game. That's crazy. It's crazy

It would never be allowed in baseball or football or hockey or basketball, but it's allowed here

in a court of law. How insane is that? Well, this legal expert weighs in. He says this recusal here's

a requirement. I agree. I do want to know what you think

please let me know when you like, comment, share, and subscribe. Go ahead and watch this video and then let me know

I'm Carmine Sabia 4 Explained America. We love you guys. God bless you

Take care, everybody. There a case Frank Alino versus Coleman from 2004 That upheld that kind of process handpicking by the DA but said if it raised on direct appeal and you can show a conflict then it shouldn be permitted It has a terrible appearance In this case I believe it goes beyond the appearance I believe under 22 New York

Code of Rules and Rules and Regulations, 100.2, 3ED3, that he has to be 3E1D3, sorry

that he must disqualify himself. That provides that if the judge has a relative to the fourth

degree who has a substantial interest that could be affected by the proceeding, then he must recuse

himself. And that's this case. The New York Post article is clear. This person, his daughter

held herself out as the digital persuasion director for Kamala Harris, now president of the

company. He must disqualify himself. There are many judges on this court. The public depends on

the integrity of the system. Now, tonight saw the DA's office responded to Trump's request for

recusal telling the judge that this daisy chain of innuendos is a far cry from evidence that this

court has a direct personal, substantial, or pecuniary interest in reaching a particular

conclusion. There's simply nothing new here that would alter this court's prior conclusion

that nothing about this proceeding will directly benefit this court family let alone the court itself So now again all of us have been you know litigating cases in courts for many years

You guys are more seasoned. I've been out of the game for a while. But this, given how important this case is, why would they want to leave even the scintilla

of a doubt about impartiality and a conflict of interest? Well, as we've talked about before, Laura, that's what's so amazing about all of these efforts against former President Trump

You would think his opponents would be more careful about what they were doing

Keep in mind, there are two issues here. The first is the one David has talked about, should the judge be recused

And by the way, from what I read today, Adam Schiff's various campaigns, political campaigns, in 2019 and 2011

at a time when he was dealing with Michael Cohen, who may be a witness in this case

spent a media buy of about $3.7 million with her with..