Perjury! - After Judge's Decision Roof Caves In On Fani Willis

Hey, ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia 4 Explain America

and Fannie Willis thought that everything was great after the judge's decision yesterday

And then, well, the roof kind of caved in. Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe

Those little things really help us out, and they help our channel continue to grow

So Fannie Willis is allowed to stay on Trump's Georgia case. We know that already

Nathan Wade, her lover, he had to go. He's off the case. He stepped aside, and she gave him a glowing review about all the things that he did. And of course, there's some things he did that she can't tell us about, or at least won't. Maybe later on when she writes a book and makes millions of dollars off this nonsense. But right now she can't. So Nathan Wade resigned from the case. Fannie Willis still on the case. The judge gave a million reasons why she shouldn't be on the case, all of which I think if she's

gets the conviction will assist Trump in an appeal of this case

I also think it's going to assist him as he goes to higher courts to try to get this

case dismissed, which I think he now has a really good shot at, considering

what the judge said in his ruling. That being said, Fannie Willis isn't done yet

because Judge Andrew Napolitano one of the great legal minds in our country he says that perjury could ultimately bring her down I want you to watch this interview with him and what he says

and then I'd like to get your thoughts on it. Do you think perjury is going to finally bring her down

I'm stunned after reading the judge's writing that she's still on the case

He made the entire case to take her off and then didn't do it. So I want to know what you guys think

Please remember to like, comment, share, and subscribe. I'm Carmine Sabia for Explained America

We love you guys. God bless you. Take care, everybody. Judge McAfee was presented with motions by the defendants

not by all of them, by the former president, and by four others, so five of them who were accused

Remember the famous phone call with the Brad Raffensberger? Just find me more votes

The one interpretation of it is just make sure that the numbers were accurate

and then they didn't just drop votes of mine. The government says, well, that was an effort to ask him to concoct votes

Judge McAvey said, whatever it is, you didn't present enough evidence so that Donald Trump and the others know what you're going to say it is when you're in court

What does that mean? Well, the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution says you're entitled to know the charges against you with specificity

and there not enough specificity here So good news is I going to throw these for Trump I going to throw these charges out The bad news is she can bring them back if she does so with more specific

but whatever that specific allegation is, she'll be confined to that in the courtroom

So we've got the headline out there. That's a great point, by the way. We've got the headline out there that again, Fannie Willis, she could remain on this case based on the findings

and the ruling by Judge McAfee, essentially saying the evidence is insufficient

of actual conflict of interest within this case. That's out there. But the special prosecutor has to step down

one or the other. It's likely that it would be Nathan Wade that would have to step down. What does that do to this case

Is that an actual blow to the election interference case, the RICO case

Well, it depends on whether or not she has her number two ready to go

The sort of scuttlebutt that we gather is that She has had a person in her office, I don't know the person's name, an experienced trial lawyer, ready to replace Nathan Wade if he or she should be removed from the position

My expectation is that she will announce this afternoon that Nathan Wade's going to go back to his private practice and so-and-so, whoever it is, is ready to go

And, Your Honor, we don't want a delay at all. And then the defendants will say well we want to delay as Professor Dershowitz so nicely predicted because we want to go to the appellate court And Judge McAfee will probably say well you can go to the appellate court but we not going to stop the pretrial proceedings

So no slowdown. I don't think there'll be a slowdown. If there is a slowdown because she's unprepared for this, that proves the point

That proves the point that her clients, the people of Fulton County

whose tax dollars went to Nathan Wade, are suffering financially because of this erasure

relationship. Yeah, I think we can sort of wrap this up for the time being. We've been following

this case, and there's been a lot of questions about her authenticity, and quite frankly

how truthful she had been on the case. The fact that she will likely remain on this case

does it in any way sort of cloud how believable it is to begin with? In my view, there is no

question but that she was untruthful on the witness stand. What is that called? That's called

perjury. She has prosecuted people for perjury. As perjury, Professor Dershowitz have said, people have gone to jail for a perjury, having perjured themselves

far less than she did. Where will that be redressed? With the voters. She will have to answer to the

voters for her misbehavior, horrible judgment, and perjury in this case