Newly Unearthed Video Of Alvin Bragg Should Get Trump's Case Thrown Out Of Court Immediately

Ladies and gentlemen, Carmine Sabia here for Explain America, and we have a video that should

end the case against Donald Trump brought by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg once

and for all. It is a video he did with Hot 97, which is a woke, progressive radio station in

the New York City area. Those of us from the area are well aware of this radio station

Now, he was on a morning show when he was campaigning, campaigning for district attorney

He was not yet district attorney, not privy to the facts, and the hosts, they wanted to know

the answer to a very simple question. Are you going to get Donald Trump? I want you to listen

to Alvin's answer. You got Ebro, that's me. You got Rosenberg, Laura Stiles is on maternity leave

and we are together with Alvin Bragg today running for Manhattan District Attorney to try to remove

Cy Vance, I think who Cy's been sitting on the gig for a couple of decades, right Alvin

He's a decade. He's going on 12 years at the end of his term

12, 12. So I have my issues with Cy Vance, and there's things that I believe he hasn't done

well. But one of the things leading into this vote for the Manhattan District Attorney's office

I know a lot of people are wondering, whoever has this job, are they going to convict Donald Trump

Look, that is the number one issue we know he's investigating. And what I'll say is I'm the only

I was the first to announce against Cy Vance. I too have a lot of issues, which is why I decided

to run. I'm the candidate in the race who has the experience with Donald Trump. I was the chief

deputy in the Attorney General's office. We sued the Trump administration over 100 times for the

Muslim travel ban, for family separation at the border, for shenanigans with the census

So I know how to litigate with him. I also led the team that did the Trump Foundation case

So I'm ready to go wherever the facts take me and to inherit that case. And I think

it'd be hard to argue with the fact that that'd be the most important, most high profile case

And I've seen him up front and seen the lawlessness that he can do. And you believe it should happen

I believe we have to hold him accountable. I haven't seen all the facts beyond the public

but I've litigated with him. And so I'm prepared to go where the facts take me once I see them

and hold them accountable. Where do you fit in as the Manhattan District Attorney versus on the federal level, the

attorney for the Southern District of New York? Who does what? Exactly. So I was in that office. I was in the public corruption unit in the Southern

District of New York. So there is sometimes working together. Oftentimes the same case

could be brought as a federal matter or as a state matter. I'll give you an example

I did the case that led to the conviction of Malcolm Smith, who was the Senate majority

leader for bribery. That could have been a state case. It's just that we were, basically

the Southern District, we've been in the lead. We were using our resources and focusing on

people using power and abusing power. And if I were Manhattan District Attorney

I would be focusing on that in a way that that office has not before

So Alvin, talk to, you know, you said leading you where the facts may lead you with regard to

dealing with Donald Trump. And from what you know today, and, you know, I know you're being careful

with your words because you're running for office. So I respect that. But I know as a voter

and a taxpayer, all I know is some of the things that I've seen would have put me in jail

So how is it not gonna put someone at his level in jail? Now, I know the answer is he's an old

white man and he's got a lot of money and he was just coming out of the office of president

But that doesn't sit well with me as a citizen of the United States and a resident of

you know, this area. No doubt. You're right. So I'm being careful, not supposed to run for office

but because every case does have to be judged on its facts and I don't know all the facts, right

And so I've been doing it for 20 plus years. So I want to be fair. But with that said

there is a lot that's out there publicly. You know, I look at what the attorney general's

looking at as a civil case, which could become a criminal case at the Manhattan DA's office

where on the one hand, he's saying, hey, look, you know, this piece of land is worth a dollar

when I want to go pay taxes, you know, taxes on it. But when I want to go get a loan

I want to go get a loan, all of a sudden it's worth a million, right? That's public

but that's public information that he did that. And so what I'm saying, that's why I'm

focusing on that. That kind of conduct right there could definitely be the basis for a case. You

know, I've done a mortgage fraud case. I've gone to trial. You know, I've done a tax fraud case

That kind of conduct right there is deeply troubling. And that's what I'm thinking about

when I say, you know, holding him accountable. So, so yeah, there, you are right. We've got

two standards of justice and Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, being a rich old white man has

allowed you to fade accountability in Manhattan. That includes Trump and his children, that they

were engaged in fraud in a SoHo real estate deal, his children. So, so you're right. We've got two

standards of justice. I grew up in the second standard in Harlem. I know all about, all about

it. And you're right. I'm being a little careful because I don't want to prejudge. And then I get

in the office and the first motion I get from the Trump team is I got to recuse myself because I

prejudged the facts, but you're right. There's a lot out there in the public domain that is so

troubling. And I say that not just as someone who's watching it, but as someone who's done

these kinds of cases, someone who's litigated with Donald Trump about fraud. And by the way

and one, right, we held him accountable in a Trump foundation case. My office did the Trump

university case. So I've seen a pattern of lawlessness over 20 years. And so I'm inclined

to believe all I see in the public domain and know that there's, and believe that there's a

path forward there to make a case. So he says all the right things. He's going to go where the facts

lead him, but he sends off the dog whistles. He lets you know where he believes the facts will

lead him because he's already decided where the facts will lead him. He's talked about how

successfully he's prosecuted the Trump organization and touts his credentials with that. What is he

saying? I can get Trump. I can get Trump. And you listen to the hosts. They're no better. Of course

there are no legal scholars. They just want Trump in prison. But what struck me was Alvin

Bragg, calling Trump, taking a cue from one of the hosts and calling Trump a rich old white man

that my friends, I promise you, you take any other district attorney

insert any other race in place of the word white, and you have the case thrown out of court

immediately. And that guy may lose his job, but it's okay to call Trump a rich old white man

The double standard obviously is glaring, but I think what it shows is that Bragg had designs

on Trump from day one. Now let's see if this judge, Judge Marchand does what any first year

law student would be able to do in this situation and knock this case right out of his courtroom

Folks, again, I'm Carmine Sabia. This is Explain America. Please make sure you like

comment, share, and subscribe. We'll keep bringing you the truth every single day

We love you guys. God bless you. Take care, everybody