'Never Happened Before' - NY Judge Gets Disastrous News After Trump Verdict

Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and the judge in New York's

case against Donald Trump, you know the one that awarded almost 400 million dollars to no particular

victim, he just got more bad news. Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment

share and subscribe. Those little things really help us out and they help our channel continue to

grow. Since the verdict, several legal experts have weighed in and they believe that former

President Donald Trump is going to be victorious on his appeal of this ridiculous verdict

Now, there was really no victim named and Letitia James says the money is going to go to the people

of New York. The people of New York weren't victimized, the banks got their money back

with interest, they were happy, they still want Donald Trump as a customer. Trump is actually in

a position where they say nobody's above the law, Trump's actually below the law. They're actually

punishing him for things that were not criminal. They're actually just inventing things using

archaic, inane laws to punish this man. It's ridiculous and it should stop. That being said

one of the people who's saying that this judge has a real problem is a former judge herself

Jeanine Pirro. Very, very steeped in legal knowledge. I want you to listen to what she

has to say and then give me your opinion in the comments. Also, please remember to like

comment, share and subscribe. Those little things really help us out and they help our channel

continue to grow. I'm Carmine Sabia for Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you

Take care, everybody. And joining us now is Saul Weisenberg, former Deputy Independent Counsel

and Fox News contributor and Tim Parlatore, former Trump attorney. Saul, is this decision supported by the evidence

Well, I certainly don't see how the part of the decision that imposes a $355 million judgment

is supported by the evidence because as the judge points out in the very first paragraph

of his opinion, and as you pointed out, there's no loss from the bank. The loans were repaid

Now, certainly you can legally engage in fraud of all kinds, even if the bank is not

even if the victim doesn't lose money, but to impose a penalty of $355 million

and to bar him for three years and his sons for two years seems to me to be completely

out of proportion to the actual loss here, which was zilch. And, you know, Tim, the the New York decision is basically saying that he misrepresented as well

since when is that a crime? Although the Trumps will not they will not concede to that at all

And they were dealing with the most sophisticated, intelligent banks that knew exactly what they

were doing. They've got every penny. They made hundreds of millions of dollars

Exactly. And you're talking about a bank here that did their own due diligence

and testified that they knew what the true numbers were based on their valuation

But also, we're not just talking about, you know, they say that there's a million dollars in the

bank when there's really five dollars in the bank. It's valuations that really come into

you know, what is the market value? What is people's opinions of the value? It's not something

that is so set in stone. And so, you know, to to then bring that to an intent to defraud

where they would have qualified for these loans anyway, and clearly they qualified for them

because they paid them all back. They pay them all back. But the interesting thing

Saul, is it meant the decision mentions Ivanka Trump and reading this Ivanka Trump was a thoughtful

articulate and poised witness. But the court found her inconsistent recall, depending on

whether she was questioned by the office of the attorney general or the defense suspect

So also, how could she be thoughtful and also suspect? I can't get inside the judge's mind, but I have a I have a question for for everybody

which is where were all of these people during the 35 years before Donald Trump became a

announced candidate for president? Why weren't these people investigating this alleged fraud

People, if there's fraud going on, the U.S. attorney's office in the Southern District

of New York, the district attorney's office in Manhattan, it doesn't seem like they were doing

their job at all. It appears that there was no effort whatsoever to even look at former President

Trump until he became a controversial political figure. And as you pointed out, the the attorney

general is really shocking and unethical. She for her to be involved in this case when she ran for

office on a platform of getting Trump, which, by the way, Alvin Bragg did and which, by the way

Fannie Willis did as well. And, you know, Saul, you and I, I mean, you know, when I was elected

D.A. or a judge, had I even said that line once, they would have removed me. But but but, Tim

what I'd like to ask you is I want you to take a listen to this sound where the judge had signaled

he was going to impose corporate death. Do we have that? All right, well, apparently the judge

has signaled he was going to impose a corporate death penalty. He was going to revoke the business

certificates. He didn't do that. And the person was depressed. It's interesting to to read the decision where he is reinstating revoking that portion of the order

based on the fact that he's imposing all of these other so-called controls and giving

giving other people essentially government appointed jobs to oversee the Trump organization. And so, you know, by doing that and by, you know, really giving significant amount

of money to a few people, that is something that saves the business licenses. And Saul

what do you think the chances are on appeal with this case? I don't know enough about New York civil law, but it strikes me to be constitutionally extremely

dubious to basically impose three hundred and fifty five million dollar judgment in a case where

there is no loss. That is just mind boggling to me. I've never seen a case where that that happened

And, you know, Saul and Tim, none of us have because it never has happened

Anyway, thanks so much for being with us this evening