Liberal Supreme Court Justice Brown Humiliated - Devastating Smackdown

Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and Liberal Justice and Joe

Biden, appointee to the Supreme Court, Katonji Jackson-Brown. She just got smacked down at the

Supreme Court. Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share and subscribe

Those little things really help us out and they help our channel continue to grow

You know, if you're going to be on the Supreme Court, it kind of helps to know the law and it

helps to not get gobsmacked really by an attorney who's arguing before you on the Supreme Court

And that's what happened to Justice Katonji Jackson-Brown today. In her argument, she said if immunity was put in the way that the Trump attorneys want it

well then wouldn't this embolden other presidents in the future to commit criminal acts knowing they

won't be prosecuted? Well gosh, that is scary. But as Trump's attorneys point out, yeah, that's

the way the country's been for the past 243 years. Now maybe this is what happens when you take

civics out of schools. You get Supreme Court justices who don't know the basic structure of

the nation. What kind of ridiculous question is that? His answer was beautiful because she was

totally smacked down. Totally smacked down. She had no answer for it. It was actually a beautiful

moment because it's good to see a Supreme Court justice who does not know what they're talking

about actually get a lesson in the Constitution and lesson in an American democracy, an American

constitutional republic, I should say. Now I've said this before, I don't think Trump's going to

win blanket immunity and I don't think he should. It would be a dangerous precedent for the country

Not for Trump, I'm not worried about him, but a president, 10 presidents down the line who could

be like, hey, I'm absolutely immune. I'm going to do this, this, this, and this. That's dangerous

But a narrow ruling? A narrow ruling could happen here and I think it should happen here and I think

these cases against Trump should be stopped because of it. I do want to know what you guys

think so please let me know in the comments. As always, please remember to like, comment, share

and subscribe. I'm Carmine Sabia for Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you

Take care, everybody. Benjamin Franklin said, as we view the prosecution of a chief executive

is something that everybody cried out against is unconstitutional. And what George Washington

said is we're worried about factional strife, which will... No, I'm also, let me, let me

let me put this worry on the table. If the potential for criminal liability is taken off

the table, wouldn't there be a significant risk that future presidents would be emboldened to

commit crimes with abandon while they're in office? It's right now the fact that we're

having this debate because the OLC has said that presidents might be prosecuted. Presidents from

the beginning of time have understood that that's a possibility. That might be what has kept this

office from turning into the kind of crime center that I'm envisioning. But once we say

no criminal liability, Mr. President, you can do whatever you want. I'm worried that we would have

a worse problem than the problem of the president feeling constrained to follow the law while he's

in office. I respectfully disagree with that because the regime you've described is the

regime we've operated under for 234 years. There has not been an expectation based on 234 years

of unbroken political. Let me ask you another question. Let me ask you another question about this