Judge Agrees With Trump! - Stormy Daniels Case Takes Drastic Turn

Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America, and it looks like

the judge in the Trump trial is starting to come around to reality

Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe

Those little things really help us out, and they help our channel continue to grow

Hey look, you guys know that Judge Juan Marchand has not been a fan of former President Donald Trump

He's been quite the enemy to former President Donald Trump, but now it appears he's siding

with the defense on something that is very key, a very key jury instruction that could

lead to Trump walking out of that courtroom scot-free. And he should

This case is an albatross. It is a horrific case that was brought by a political power-hungry district attorney

and influenced by somebody who used to work for Biden's Department of Justice who's on

this case. So what's going on here is the defense said, hey look, you gotta tell the jury this one

thing because this is very important. And the judge looks like he's agreed with it

Well this sets the whole trial on fire. If this actually comes to pass, and it looks like it will, I predict Trump walks out of

that courtroom a free man. I want you to listen to this legal expert explain it in detail, and then let me know

what you think about it in the comments. Let's watch the video

It's engaging for passerbys. It deals with how the jury will be instructed

That could very well determine the outcome in this case. The government is arguing some pretty sweeping positions

Among them, they are arguing that they don't have to prove willful intent on all of the

elements, on all of these actions. They're suggesting that things like unlawful means, which is really an important term of

influencing election, can be satisfied by less than the criminal standard. And the defense, I think, legitimately saying, whoa, you're going to convict someone on a

lower than criminal standard on an important element. And this is really the result of this sort of Frankenstein case

Brad took this dead misdemeanor, zapped it back into life as a felony by sort of stitching

together different crimes. And now the government's trying to use that to say, yeah, we did that

But it also means we don't have to prove the full criminal standard on all elements

So let me ask about having brought Robert Costello to the stand