Investigation Reveals Horrifying Facts About Judge In DC Case - Trump Was Right All Along

Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America

and the judge, Judge Chania Chutkin, in the D.C. case against former President Donald Trump

She's got some really bad news, and it could mean the end for her

Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe. Those little things really help us out, and they help our channel continue to grow

So the judge in the D.C. case brought by Jack Smith, the special counsel, or special prosecutor

well, we know she's the harshest punisher of January 6th defendants, and we know that she is, well, let's say, a little overzealous

And we've talked about how she has seemingly an anti-Trump bias, but an investigation done by Real Clear Investigations shows that not only does she have a little bias

it's against former President Donald Trump, if you believe her own words

During the sentencing of several defendants, she kept referring to one man

one man who she said is responsible for all of this, everything that happened on January 6th

this one man was responsible for, and this one man had to, should be before her in the court

and this one man is still a free man, kind of an indication that this man should be in prison

Now, I guess the one man could mean anybody, but who would the one man be that she would be saying is responsible for January 6th

Was it Chuck Schumer? Was it Bernie Sanders? Probably not. Was it Colonel Sanders? Probably not

No, it was probably Donald Trump. In fact, she kept referencing him very vaguely in open court, in front of people, for the record

That's very dangerous. If this is the judge in your case that is supposed to adjudicate your trial

that is supposed to see to it that you have a fair hearing in front of, you know

a jury of your peers, the evidence presented is fair, everything's fair in your trial

this is the person that you, Donald Trump, have to depend on

to make sure things are done fairly and squarely in your trial. Well, how can you do that if she's kind of already passed judgment on you in other cases

She's insinuated you shouldn't be a free man. She's insinuated you should be in court on charges

She's insinuated you're already guilty of the charges that are before you right now

She's done this already. How can she sit on this case? This should be brought before a board, and she should be removed from this case immediately

or have this moved from the DC Circuit completely, and moved somewhere else where this man can get a fair trial

even though he shouldn't be on trial to begin with, in my opinion, because in my opinion, these charges are ridiculous

That being said, if he's gotta have the trial, I get so angry, trying not to curse

but if he has to have the trial, let it be fair. Let it be fair

It's hard to believe that it could be fair with this judge

and the words she's said in the past, sitting on the bench

trying to call balls and strikes in this case. It'd be like if you're a Yankee fan

and the umpire in your game is wearing a Red Sox hat. I wanna know what you think about this in the comments

so please let me know. Also, remember to like, comment, share, and subscribe

because that really helps us out. I'm Carmine Sabia. This is Explain America

We love you guys. God bless you. Take care, everybody