'I'm About To Smack You': Jesse Watters Levels Liberal Co-Host, Leaves Her in Stunned Silence
Jul 27, 2024
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsMSFwBF-4SWD5msARwYkdw/join
Read The Story: https://explainamerica.com/1565467/
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America
0:04
Jessica Tarlov and Jesse Waters, wow did they get into it on Fox News
0:09
Folks before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share and subscribe
0:14
We really appreciate that stuff, it really helps our channel continue to grow
0:18
So the liberal host of the five, and one of the most conservative hosts, were talking
0:23
about the cases against Trump yesterday, in particular, the federal case. And Tarlov was trying to make her case about why it's so serious and why Jesse Waters
0:33
and the rest of the crew have to take it so seriously. And of course a federal case is serious
0:39
But I think what Jesse was trying to point out was that there's a hypocrisy to it, you
0:45
know, now suddenly the things you never cared about, you care about
0:50
And then, well, then he threatened to smack Tarlov. Let's take a look at it
0:54
A couple of things. So the Presidential Records Act, and Andy McCarthy was talking about this earlier today
0:59
it doesn't apply to agency documents. So the way that people are using this to say, I think you said it yesterday, Jesse, oh
1:06
you know, he's allowed to do this, he's not allowed to do it. And there are legal experts
1:09
No good argument. Yeah, it is a good argument that he's not allowed to have those documents
1:14
He can't decide when he declassifies them. He admitted that on tape, which is going to be a huge piece of evidence in this
1:19
So stop using the Presidential Records Act. I will use that act whenever I damn well please
1:24
I will continue to do it inaccurately. In terms of the. I printed it out
1:27
I'll tell you something. Thank God I printed it out, because I'm about to smack you with the act in a second
1:34
Let me talk about the Espionage Act. So this isn't classic espionage
1:39
Within the Espionage Act, there are a lot of things included. Most importantly, unauthorized retention of documents and obstruction of justice, which
1:48
it seems pretty clear that they have them on. And again, legal experts, both sides of the aisle, people who have defended Trump multiple
1:54
times like Jonathan Turley, have said, and I said this on Friday as well, that these
1:58
are the darlings, what they're looking for in order to have. Is it a sad day
2:03
Yes, in one sense. It's always sad, I guess, to see a president in this position
2:08
But what's more sad, I think, is that we had a president who did these things
2:13
And when everyone says this is unprecedented, the problem is that Donald Trump is doing
2:18
things that are unprecedented. And we don't know that these documents weren't compromised
2:22
We heard about that there were two intruders, two Chinese national intruders
2:26
We know that he waved around a classified document in front of Mark Meadows. Now you care about Chinese nationals
2:32
What do you, the amount of deflection that goes on when I say, I say something about
2:37
China and you go fang fang, or I say something about this and then you just throw, Hunter Biden's a crack addict
2:42
Who cares? Talk about what happened today. Talk about the indictment and don't make up things
2:47
Use legal experts. That's a good transition. Jesse, talk about the indictment. I'm glad, but before I get into the act, which I have right here
2:53
Okay, so taking the threat aside, what Jesse's saying is correct. Suddenly now you care about Chinese nationals, but when it was Eric Swalwell and fang fang
3:03
you didn't care about Chinese nationals. The things you care about, they seem to be determined by who you support
3:10
And if you don't support them, you care. And if you do support them, oh, it's no big deal
3:15
So Jesse kind of nailed this and, you know, I mean, he always does
3:19
Tarlov, of course, is just an annoying person. You know, she's, I don't know why they have her there really
3:26
Honestly, you don't see MSNBC having somebody like her on. You don't see CNN having somebody like her on, but from the Republican side, you don't
3:32
see that happen. You only see it on Fox for some reason. They have this doctrine of fairness
3:37
I don't get it, but whatever the case may be, folks, it was great to watch him kind
3:42
of tear her down. And you know, he's right. At the end of the day, he's correct
3:49
Folks, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe. Again, I'm Carmine Sabia
3:53
This is Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you.
Political Humor
Scandals & Investigations
Politics
Media Critics & Watchdogs


