'Historic Mistake' - Trump - Stormy Daniels Case Derailed By Blockbuster Report

Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and it looks like

Alvin Bragg has made a massive mistake. Before we get started, please make sure you like

comment, share and subscribe. Those little things really help us out and they help our channel

continue to grow. Now, New York Times columnist, this is not a place where you would see anything

pro-Trump usually, says that Alvin Bragg has made a massive mistake here by even bringing this case

against Trump. He says it sets a horrible precedent for what can be used in the future. A lot of

people call it lawfare, which is kind of like warfare but using the law. A lot of people believe

that Trump is being unfairly persecuted. I'm one of those people. I think they're trying anything

and everything to get him. I think Alvin Bragg's case is a complete ridiculous hodgepodge of

nonsense and I'm not a legal expert but I know enough to know when I see something that's

doing mental gymnastics to bring a crime as this appears to be doing. But you don't usually hear

about it in New York Times and New York Times has been pretty anti-Trump and pretty

anti-Republican but in this case, even they're speaking out about it. I want you to watch this

clip and let me know what you think. As always, please remember to like, comment, share and

subscribe. I'm Carmine Sabia for Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you. Take care everybody

Thank you for joining us tonight. The conspiracy of dunces, that's the focus of tonight's angle

You know it's bad for the Trump hush money prosecution when the New York Times feels

compelled to publish a piece calling out the case's weakness. Jed Sugarman, a law professor

at Boston University, called Alvin Bragg's case a historic mistake, writing, their vague

allegation about a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 presidential election has him more concerned

than ever about their unprecedented use of state law and their persistent avoidance of specifying

an election crime or a valid theory of fraud. Oh that's all. Now beyond that, he rightly notes that

it is legal for a candidate to pay a non-disclosure agreement. Pay for a non-disclosure agreement. Hush

money is unseemly, but it is legal. All right, bottom line here. As honest, objective legal

minds have concluded, the underlying conduct alleged, if anything, is a violation of federal

campaign finance rules. But one little problem with that. The FEC looked at the case years ago

and decided against pursuing it. Now from day one, Alvin Bragg was a man on a political, not

a legal mission. It was to charge Trump with whatever just to keep him in court, maybe, maybe

get lucky and get a conviction. The truth is the underlying conduct doesn't even merit a misdemeanor

charge because there's no intent to defraud without a federal crime in this case. This is a

political hit job being run by one of Biden's DOJ's former top officials. Are we to actually believe

that the lead prosecutor, Matthew Colangelo, just so happened to land this job at this time by

accident? All right, one of the former top officials in the Biden DOJ, this has