Game Over: DA Fani Willis Case Against Trump DEAD

Fannie, Fannie, oh Fannie, you're caught and you're getting taken to school

Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share and subscribe

Those little things really help us out and they help our channel continue to grow

So Fannie Willis, she's in a lot of trouble folks. Not only could she get disqualified from the case

and that's starting to appear more likely, you know, her case against Donald Trump and his

co-defendants, that big Rico case in Georgia, she might actually get tried for perjury

But now, now there's even more to the story. See, a few days ago I told you that Fannie Willis met

with Kamala Harris and it's on the books. Now she testified under oath that she did not meet

with Kamala Harris, that she did not go to the White House before this investigation and meet

with anybody. And the lie detector test determined that was a lie. Why? Because we have the White

House records that show that she did. That's number one. Here's number two. We have now found

a letter from Fannie Willis's office to the White House, well to the Democrats I should say in

Congress, not the White House, to the Democrats in Congress who were leading the Trump investigations

and she wanted to know if they had any information they could help her with so that she could use

that against Trump in his criminal prosecution. Now that smells a lot like collusion to me. I don't

know about you guys, but yeah, that has the definite whiff of collusion. How do we know

Well, because there's now a House investigation into Fannie Willis. This woman's life got destroyed

because she decided to pick a fight with Donald Trump. Folks, I want you to watch this quick video

and then I want you to please like, comment, share and subscribe. It really helps us out

I'm Carmine Sabia for Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you. Take care everybody

A constitutional law attorney and Fox News contributor. Great to have you today. Thank you

for joining us. So the big question now is which way this judge will go and are there any telltale

signs maybe in court from what we saw? No, this judge has not given any indication. This is a

difficult question because in Georgia there is remarkable ambiguity as to what standard he's

supposed to apply. Both sides admitted that it wasn't clear whether you have to establish an

actual conflict of interest or whether an appearance would suffice. And there are cases

supporting both arguments. The problem is I think that the court is going to have to recognize

that the testimony of these two prosecutors was really left in tatters. It seems clear to many

of us that Nathan Wade did not answer truthfully in his divorce proceedings when asked if he had

a sexual relationship during the course of his marriage up to the point at which he filed his

answer. He insists that he simply read that in a rather strange and narrow way. Willis is also

standing contradicted. You know, the new evidence involving cell phones show in one case these

pings, these locational data points showing Wade going to the area of Willis' home, being there

for hours, and then returning along the same path in the early morning. And on either end of that

are calls or texts to Willis. That seems to shatter her denial that they had this pre-existing

relationship and also that he never stayed at her home. So the question for the judge is going to be

well, if you believe that they in fact lied on the stand, how can you believe the other answers

Oh, it's a great question. And you know, so many people were brought into this, people from their lives