Federal Judge Lays Smackdown On Alvin Bragg - Jim Jordan Scores Massive Victory
Jul 27, 2024
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsMSFwBF-4SWD5msARwYkdw/join
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
Ladies and gentlemen, I'm Carmine Sabia and this is Explain America
0:04
Folks, Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan District Attorney, who has taken former President Donald Trump to task and indicted him, well, he just got
0:13
smacked down by a judge and Jim Jordan has won the day
0:18
Folks, before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe
0:22
It really helps us out. So what happened is Alvin Bragg's assistant, Pomerantz, was asked or
0:29
subpoenaed to testify before Congress about how federal funds are being used in the Trump investigation, indictment, and prosecution, and
0:38
Alvin Bragg sent a lawsuit of his own to block that subpoena
0:43
You know, and he claimed all kinds of things, that it was politically motivated, which is rich for him to say, and other things that he
0:49
shouldn't have to testify or his office shouldn't have to testify. Well, the judge smacked that down and the testifying is due tomorrow
0:58
Now they are appealing it, but you know, time is of the essence and time is running out
1:02
Let's take a look at this report from CNN as the news broke. Tonight, a federal judge just issued a new ruling in the showdown between
1:09
the Manhattan District Attorney and House Republicans, the judge denying District Attorney Alvin Bragg's request to block the congressional
1:16
subpoena of a former prosecutor. All of this coming from Bragg's role in Donald Trump's indictment
1:23
CNN's Kara Skinnell is outside the courthouse in Manhattan. Kara, so what does this ruling mean
1:30
Well, Alex, this ruling came just two hours after a spirited oral argument in the courthouse just behind me, the judge issuing this
1:36
written order in which she denied the District Attorney Alvin Bragg's request to block a subpoena for former prosecutor Mark Pomeranz's testimony
1:44
Now, the judge said there was a lot of politics at play on both sides, but she said the issue before her was this particular subpoena and the
1:51
question whether Congress had a legislative purpose in issuing the subpoena. Now, the House lawyers argued that they did have a subpoena
1:58
and even one of Bragg's attorneys conceded in court that the Congress
2:03
did have a right to oversee the use of federal funds. They said that they used about $5,000 for their broad investigation
2:10
into the former president. The judge agreed, and in her order, she wrote, it is not the role of the
2:15
federal judiciary to dictate what legislation Congress may consider or how it should conduct its deliberations in that connection
2:22
Mr. Pomeranz must appear for the congressional deposition. No one is above the law
2:27
The judge also criticized Pomeranz, saying that he put himself in this
2:31
in this predicament because of the book that he wrote. That was a tell-all, essentially, of his time in the DA's office
2:37
At various points during the hearing, she held up a copy of the book. You know, but of course, here, Alex, time is of the essence
2:44
The deposition is set for tomorrow. And speaking of time, does the district attorney have time to appeal
2:49
Well, they've already noticed the judge that they're asking for a stay of the deposition, saying, you know, could you postpone this deposition at some point
2:56
in the future to give them time to go to the federal appeals court to have
3:00
them look at the merits, the real legal arguments in this case. Now, the DA's office also told the judge that Pomeranz himself is going to seek
3:07
emergency relief by the federal appeals court. But it's a question of how quickly does this appeals court act because the
3:12
deposition is set for tomorrow in Washington, D.C. at 10 a.m. You know, we have not heard the house did issue a statement saying that this
3:19
did validate their subpoena and they look forward to this testimony. But it really will be a question here of how quickly does the appeals court rule
3:26
and whether Pomeranz will give this testimony. Now, the house attorney is in court today
3:30
Also, we're saying that they will not hold Pomeranz in contempt of court
3:34
tomorrow if he doesn't answer questions. They said there is a process, but this all still remains to be seen how it will play out
3:40
So as you can see, things not looking good. So as you can see, things not looking great for Alvin Bragg, are they
3:47
It's funny how the law works, Alvin. Sometimes you're the one holding the hammer
3:51
Sometimes you're the nail, huh? Folks, I want to thank you for joining us here at Explain America
3:56
Again, my name is Carmine Sabia. Please remember to like, comment, share and subscribe
4:01
We love you guys. God bless you. Take care, everybody
Courts & Judiciary
Legal
Other


