Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsMSFwBF-4SWD5msARwYkdw/join
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
Hey, ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine's ABF4, Explain America
0:04
and things just keep getting worse for Fannie Willis. Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe
0:12
Those little things really help us out, and they help our channel continue to grow
0:17
Please forgive my laughter, but it's like Fannie Willis is just falling down the stairs at this point
0:23
and nobody's stopping it. I'm not going to take too much of your time because I want you to watch this video
0:28
because it's a dozy. It was on CNN, so I know a lot of you probably didn't see it
0:34
but Fannie Willis's lover, Nathan Wade, is giving an interview where he's about, in my opinion
0:41
to basically prove that both Fannie Willis and himself committed perjury, and right as he's about to give his answer, he starts giving the answer
0:49
He's called offstage by a handler who basically advises him to stop talking
0:55
I want you to watch this and let me know what you think in the comment. What is your current relationship with the district attorney
1:02
Just as outlined earlier, we are great friends. We speak regularly. You know, the conversation has changed, though, whereas before our conversations were about this case
1:16
I sure you could imagine and appreciate the amount of time that it takes that you have to pour into a case trying to a case of this magnitude trying to prosecute those defendants but our
1:31
conversations have shifted to how are you how are you handling the threats
1:36
that are coming your way are you being safe and you know democracy the case
1:45
will live on kind of thing just to clarify when Did the romantic relationship between the two of you start
1:54
Yeah. So, you know, we get into, there's been this effort to say that, okay, these exact dates are at issue
2:09
and these exact dates are, I'm getting, I'm getting signaled here. Okay, then we have
2:21
Yeah, same is. Do I go off the mic for a second? Yes. Okay
2:27
Keep rolling. Keep rolling. Don't stop down. Go to listen. Stay as for you
2:49
Thank you Everything That's good
2:59
Yeah, good. Yeah, good. Yeah, we're good. Everything okay? Yeah. Just to revisit the question, it was to clarify when the romantic relationship started and when it is
3:14
Sure. So, you know, I believe that the public has, through the testimony and other interviews
3:23
the public has a clear snapshot that this is clearly just a distraction. It is not a relevant issue in this case
3:32
and I think that we should be focusing on more of the facts and the indictment in the case
3:38
Well, I ask because obviously this is, it's still a pending matter. It's going to be before the Court of Appeals
3:44
You talked about how proud you were of all the work that you did in this office
3:48
And I think the question that people have when they hear from the Court of Appeals
3:52
this isn't happening until next spring, is, did the relationship jeopardize that work that you did in this investigation
4:00
And therein lies the issue, why we wouldn't touch upon the work of the Court of Appeals
4:07
or some higher court because it a pending issue before them I think that we should allow them take a step back and allow them to take the evidence that they have and do that work make the decision
4:20
Right, but you did testify to this, and you were asked about, on the standabout
4:24
when it started and when it ended, it just wasn't completely clear
4:28
because before it said, before the indictment, which was August 15th here in Atlanta
4:34
and then later the answer was at the end of that year
4:38
year. And so I think that was the clarity that people were seeking of when it started and when it
4:44
ended. Sure. And there again, there's a question before the court. And that is the crux of the
4:52
question. I don't choose to say or do anything that would jeopardize the case or the court's
4:59
ruling. I prefer to allow them to make their decision based upon what they have and accept it
5:06
Do you believe, as you reflect on this, that your relationship with the district attorney was a mistake
5:12
Absolutely not. Absolutely not. What I believe is this whole conversation is a distraction
5:18
That's all. It's a tool to stop the train, to slow down the inevitable, which is the trial of the defendants named in the election interference case
News
Scandals & Investigations
Other
Other


