'Don't Get it Twisted' - Trump Attorney Alina Habba Goes Scorched Earth After Verdict

Hey, ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia 4 Explain America, and it looks like Alina Haba, she's not done bringing it to E. Jean Carroll

Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe

Those little things really help us out, and they help our channel continue to grow. Just yesterday, E. Jean Carroll, while she originally in the trial, asked for $10 million

During closing arguments, they increased their asks to $24 million. and the New York City jury said, how to heck with that, $83 million and change

So it's ridiculous to the point of insanity. I just don't believe that Trump can get anything close to fair in a New York court

I don't believe that. I can't say that for sure because, of course, I don't want to do anything to get sued, I guess

But I just don't believe that. That's a possibility. Now, what's something very interesting happened after that, though

Lena Haba was going off and she was talking about all the problems that she saw in this case

And as she was starting to make some really good points CNN cuts away from her and of course does there no no no no no none of this is true Here a real truth Nonsense propaganda I want you to watch the video and give me your thoughts about

what Alina Haba is saying. Also, please remember to like, comment, share, and subscribe. It really

helps us out. I'm Carmine Sabia. For Explained America, we love you guys. God bless you. Take care

everybody. There was no proof. And I couldn't prove that she didn't

didn't bring in the dress, there was no DNA, there was no expert. My experts were denied

Two of them, two of them were denied to come in. They didn't bring, let me bring up that

Reed Hoffman funded Ms. Kaplan. And you know what we got in there? That my witness, who was her friend

who said that she is a drug addict and the drug addict is herself. That friend I found out in there

was paid for by Ms. Kaplan's firm, and that is disgusting. That is a violation of everything I stand for, and that is why I stand with Trump

And that is why so many Americans are so proud that he is running again and so excited to run to the ballot box

But don't get it twisted. We are seeing a violation of our justice system. Ladies and gentlemen you are not allowed to be stripped of every defense that you have You are not allowed to be told All right So you getting an idea now about why Donald Trump attorney is perceived as effective as she is

which is not particularly effective. Laura Coates, if you could truth squat a little bit of this

Alina Haba was saying that Donald Trump was not allowed to introduce defenses

What is she talking about? She's talking about nonsense and she's trying to rewrite history and I honestly would not be surprised if she herself is now vulnerable to accusations that she has made defamatory statements of some kind without proof to the contrary

But let me tell you, he did have an opportunity, Jake. This was the damages phase of a trial that he could have attended last year

His presence was voluntary in the sense of whether he was required to actually sit in the trial

trial, but his defense was not voluntary. He had every opportunity, essentially, to put forth evidence

to put up a defense, to testify himself, to do all the things that she spoke of on that courthouse

staff just now. They made a decision that was different from that. Now you had the penalty

phase of a trial and the judge specifically told them here are the parameters We not relitigating this issue A jury has already decided the issue that you could have participated fully in And for that reason you are limited in trying to have a second bite at the apple even in the big apple That was the clear directive from the judge

And so to suggest somehow that it is New York or the jury system or somehow something

nefarious was going on that muzzled the defense in the way that they chose to

actually defend the case is truly ludicrous. But you know, this is really par for the course in terms of why what you saw on the courthouse steps has been additive for a campaign, even if it is destructive inside of a courtroom

But make no mistake, America, the only role of this particular defense counsel during this phase of the trial was about the damages, not whether a sexual assault had occurred, not the decisions of whether it was discredited

were issues of fact, as we call them, meaning the fact finder, the jury, whose job it is to

determine the credibility of witnesses before them, to assess the evidence, to follow the

instructions at the judge, they made a determination. They would like a different conclusion

but that is not injustice defined. Thank you