Deputy FBI Director Admits Unthinkable - Agency Concealed Part Of Alleged Biden Bribery Scheme

Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America

And we have a bombshell story coming from the Senate, where the FBI's deputy director was caught with his pants down, so to speak

Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe

Those little things really help us out and they help our channel continue to grow

Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn had the FBI's deputy director on the hot seat

and she started grilling, ladies and gentlemen. She started grilling. She got him backed into a corner about why

why the FBI would redact information pertaining to 17 audio recordings, two of which belong to Joe Biden, 15 of which belong to Hunter Biden, allegedly

as they talked to a Burisma executive in what is allegedly a bribery scandal

where Joe Biden and his family allegedly got $5 million. Did I say allegedly enough

So she got the FBI's deputy director backed into a corner and he tried giving her platitudes about

we're the best and we're the greatest and our people are wonderful. She wasn't having it

And she got him to basically admit what he didn't want to admit. Let's take a look at it

Why did you decide to conceal the information in that revelation to the House Oversight Committee

Why did you redact all of that pertaining to the phone calls

We have exceptional people within the FBI. You're not answering the question

Why did you redact that information? And they work relentlessly every day to keep this country safe and to protect people

You chose not to reveal that the calls were there and Senator Grassley found it out anyway

Is that accurate? With regard to the document. You chose to redact it. Yes or no

We often redact documents to protect. So you chose to redact the fact that there are 17 voice recordings

two of those with the now president. You chose to redact that and not to give that to House Oversight

I have no idea if their voice recordings are not what I will tell you with respect to the document

The document was redacted to protect the source as everyone knows. Well, then this is a question of life and death potentially

But I think it would be helpful if when you came before

Now he claims to personally have no knowledge of this redaction, but he goes back to protecting sources and methods

And I actually get that because this would protect a source, the Burisma executive

And I understand why they would do it. Still, it is curious that they would redact it from, you know, the Senate

It's not from the media. This is from the Senate. So her question, is your job really to protect Joe Biden and his family

or to protect the American people, is a valid question. And I thought she did a great job with it

I would love to know what you guys think in the comments. How do you think she did

And is anything going to come of this? Is anybody actually going to ever have to pay for their crimes unless they're named Trump

Folks, please make sure again that you also in addition to commenting

like, share and subscribe. We really do appreciate that stuff. Again, I'm Carmine Sabia. This is Explain America

We love you guys. God bless you. Take care, everybody