Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsMSFwBF-4SWD5msARwYkdw/join
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and Republican Firebrand
0:05
Representative Nancy Mace blew the doors off the Biden administration at today's first
0:11
impeachment inquiry hearing. Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share and subscribe
0:18
Those little things really help us out and they help our channel continue to grow
0:23
Nancy Mace was in rare form. This impeachment inquiry is super important and I think that if the networks cover it
0:32
and if the media reports these things as they should be reported and the evidence is seen
0:38
by the American people, Joe Biden is in a lot of trouble in 2024
0:44
You have to understand, even if he gets impeached, the Senate's not going to remove him
0:49
It's just not the votes aren't there. It's a Democrat controlled Senate
0:52
The votes aren't there. It's not going to happen. So what we have is we have this impeachment inquiry, impossible impeachment, and it's
1:00
really for the American people. The American people are going to go to the voting booth and they're going to decide if
1:05
Joe Biden gets impeached in essence by kicking him out of the White House in 2024 if that's
1:12
what the American people decide. That's why these hearings are so important
1:16
And when Nancy Mace went off the rails today and she cursed a little bit, we're going to
1:21
be honest, got to warn you that before you watch it, she, she had every right to because
1:28
the media, the Democrats have lied about what's actually happening. They've lied about what's actually in the evidence and she let him have it today
1:38
Let's take a look. Representative Raskin, he said in 2019, there's no formal constitutional or statutory or even
1:46
the house rule for how an impeachment inquiry is to begin. And so it means different things to different people
1:50
I don't want to hear another word from the left or anyone across the other side of the aisle about impeachment inquiry
1:55
This is complete and total hypocrisy this morning. Today we're going to bring the facts
2:00
Today we are going to bring the evidence. In 2017, the Joe Biden family teamed up with Chinese company CEFC to make millions off
2:09
of granting access to Joe Biden. Hunter even arranged for Joe Biden to share office space with the CCP aligned company CEFC
2:16
My Democrat colleagues say none of this is relevant because Joe Biden wasn't vice president
2:21
while his family did these shady deals. Turns out that's complete and total bullshit
2:27
It's a lie. Hunter Biden referred to access to his father as the keys to his family's only asset
2:33
Those words are going to come back and haunt Hunter Biden and his family forever
2:39
Yesterday, the Ways and Means Committee released an FBI memo on the interview they had with
2:43
Tony Bobulinski, a former Biden partner in crime. I'll read a bit of that right now
2:49
The work conducted by CEFC, Gilear, Walker, Hunter Biden, James Biden, and Yee over the
2:54
preceding two years was discussed in detail. In particular, CEFC was closing significant investment deals in Poland, Kazakhstan, Romania
3:02
Oman, and the Middle East during this period of time. Period of time is in reference to the years 2015 and 2016 when guess what
3:12
Joe Biden was vice president. As an aside, Rob Walker in previous testimony also confirmed that Joe Biden attended a meeting
3:20
with the head of CEFC. So now we know CEFC was working with the Biden family while Joe Biden was vice president
3:27
And I'll continue reading from Tony Bobulinski's report, which says, and I quote Bobulinski
3:33
Hunter Biden and James Biden did not receive compensation because Joe Biden was still vice
3:37
president during this time period. There is a concern it would be improper for payments to be made to Hunter Biden and James
3:44
Biden by CEFC due to its close affiliation with the Chinese government
3:50
Hunter Biden and James Biden both wanted to be compensated for the assistance they had
3:54
provided to CEFC's ventures. In particular, they believe CEFC owed them money for the benefits that accrued to CEFC
4:03
through its use of the Biden family name to advance their business dealings
4:07
The Bidens coincidentally were paid over a million dollars by CCP affiliated Chinese
4:13
company CEFC shortly after Joe Biden left office as vice president. Now we know why, because it was back pay
4:24
I'm going to show another image. This is a text message between Hunter Biden and Gong Wendong, an agent of CEFC
4:32
Hunter says my uncle will be here with his brother in all caps who would like to say
4:38
hello to the chairman. He goes on, Jim's brother, if he's coming, wants to say hello
4:43
His uncle's brother. Hmm. I wonder who that could be. I can't quite figure it out
4:49
Hunter puts brother in all caps and it doesn't take a genius to figure this out
4:54
But since I'm not always dealing with geniuses and Washington, D.C. has has been illustrated
4:59
today, I'll spell it out. The brother of Hunter Hunter's uncle, Jim, is Joe Biden
5:08
Why was Hunter so secretive about his father? I'm going to tell you why
5:12
It's because Joe Biden didn't want the American people to know he and his family were getting
5:17
paid millions and millions of dollars from a company closely tied to the Chinese Communist Party
5:23
CEFC knew paying Biden family members was bad, so they covered it up
5:29
Hunter knew Joe Biden hanging out with CCP businessmen would be a bad look
5:33
So he tried to pull a genius move on us with this whole my uncle's brother bullshit
5:38
We already know the president took bribes from Burisma. I also want to add betraying your country is treason
5:47
Mr. Chairman, I ask unanimous consent to enter into the record this text message between
5:50
Hunter Biden and Gongling Dong and the FBI memo regarding their interview with Tony Bob
5:55
Alinsky showing Joe Biden's connections to CFC during his vice presidency without objections
6:00
to order. Professor Turley, we got 30 seconds in your experience in reviewing cases of fraud to
6:05
people who are conducting legitimate business usually go through these efforts and hoops
6:09
to keep their foreign entanglements hidden. Yes, the the the issue with with with influence peddling is that it can in some circumstances
6:19
be legal, but it's not something that necessarily is made public. The public does not buy into the idea that you can sell your family brand if it's influence peddling
6:28
So what happens with influence peddling is that you often have the Commission of Crimes
6:31
that conceal it and to take steps so that it's not public
6:36
That may include, but it's not necessarily the reason in this case, but it may include
6:41
the failure to pay taxes, the failure to register as a foreign agent. And part of the purpose of an inquiry is to see if there is a linkage between those acts
6:49
and more importantly, a linkage to the president. Can I briefly respond to the earlier attack
6:54
You may have additional questions. I don't want to take your time. Mr. Chairman. I'm sorry, the gentlelady's over time, but we'll work with you on that because I do think
7:04
you need to respond to that ridiculous statement. Now chair recognizes Mr. Khanna for five minutes
7:12
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Turley, you testified or in your written statement about best practices for the House
7:20
and you say that it's not legally required for the House to vote, to have an impeachment
7:27
inquiry, but it is a best practice. Now look, the media and the Democrats are pretending that this is about Hunter Biden
7:32
on a laptop. It's not. This is all about Joe Biden influence peddling as vice president of the United States
7:39
That's what this is about. And did it extend to when he was president of the United States
7:43
Did it extend during the 2020 campaign? We don't know. That's the reason for an impeachment inquiry
7:49
So when you hear the media and Democrats say they're having an impeachment inquiry with
7:52
no evidence, tell them to get Webster's dictionary and look up what the word inquiry means
7:58
An inquiry means you're looking for the evidence. That's why there's an inquiry
8:03
They have some evidence to go on, but they're looking for more
8:07
That's the entire point. That's why this is not an impeachment. It's an impeachment inquiry
8:11
Folks, let me know what you think about this story and Nancy Mace's performance in the
8:15
comment section. Also please remember to like, share and subscribe. It really helps us out
8:20
I'm Carmine Sabia. This is Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you
8:26
Take care, everybody
Politics
Legislative Branch
Campaigns & Elections


