'Absolutely Unacceptable' - Judge Makes Shocking Decision In Trump Case``

Hey ladies and gentlemen this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America and the judge in Donald Trump's

case against Alvin Bragg with Stormy Daniels as a witness, the hush money trial as it's called

well that just got a shockwave. Before we get started please make sure you like, comment

share and subscribe. Those little things really help us out and they help our channel continue

to grow. Judge Juan Merchant has been no friend to Donald Trump. He's pretty much done everything

the prosecution wants and allowed nothing the defense wants and that has continued here with

what I think is one of the biggest travesties in legal history. You have to understand first of

all we're talking about a class C, class C felony, I'm sorry class E felony. It's the lowest form of

felony that they had to do gymnastics basically, mental gymnastics to put together to begin with

to create a felony. And now anybody who's seen My Cousin Vinny knows prosecutors have to turn

over their files including witness lists to the defense. But this judge has ruled that Alvin

Bragg's team does not have to do that. Gosh I wonder why people think he's biased you know

what with his daughter working for campaigns like Adam Schiff and Biden Harris. Why do they think

this judge is biased? I don't know. Every decision appears to go against Trump. That may be a reason

I want you to take a look at what they talked about here on Fox News and they explain it in

great detail and then let me know what you think. As always please remember to like, comment

share and subscribe. I'm Carmine Sabia for Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you

Maybe some AI. Right and I think what this is reflecting is why Trump and his team have so

many questions about the impartiality of these jurors and also frankly the judge. And I find it

intriguing that while the jurors were supposed to take them at their word when they say oh yes I can

be impartial but then we're supposed to ignore if they've said negative things about his persona

Now the judge has been clear not liking him as separate from being impartial but that's hard to

hear and that's hard to digest as a human when you're raising questions and then when that is

phrased as attacking as we just heard. I find it frankly absolutely unacceptable that the judge

won't let or will approve the prosecution withholding the witness names from the Trump team

Their explanation was well we don't want him to attack them on social media. Doesn't the gag order

work? Isn't there enough faith in the court system? Shouldn't that be the barrier in place? Why are we

having to listen to a prosecutor's words over and over again that seem to weigh so much more heavily

rather than a defendant's when you know quite well Kayleigh in the system it actually

always favors the defendant. That's the whole point here. We always favor and protect the

defendant. Clearly not here. I have a lot of questions and I'll just close by saying I find it

another additionally intriguing that it took six years for these charges to be brought and

juries and paneled in two days. There's a lot of questions that I have. These two men started

inching toward each other in the political game David. So you know I have to call it lawfare

I have served on a jury in New York City Manhattan and in in that instance there were several people

who were very eager with a lot of time on their hands to be on that jury and it was a little

unnerving. There was an acquittal though however in that case. I want to note quickly James Freeman's

column the Trump trial on democracy