'Absolutely Exculpatory' - Bombshell New Documents Clear Trump's Name

Hey ladies and gentlemen, this is Carmine Sabia for Explain America, and former President

Donald Trump just got fantastic news about his case with Jack Smith, and Mr. Smith, well

he got some really terrible news at the same time. Before we get started, please make sure you like, comment, share, and subscribe

Those little things really help us out, and they help our channel continue to grow

The attorney for Bernard Carrick, now you may remember him as the former New York City

Police Commissioner, and what a police commissioner he was. New York was not a cesspool of drugs and violence and assaults and all kinds of things that

are happening in that city now that weren't happening when Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Police

Commissioner Bernard Carrick were there. Be that as it may, Mr. Carrick, he's also one of the people that has been contacted

by Jack Smith's office. Well, as it turns out, in July, Jack Smith's office requested certain paperwork from Mr. Carrick

Now, they got that paperwork. They went ahead and indicted President Trump anyway, because that was the end goal from

the beginning, right? Jack Smith was hired to do a job, and he did that job. Period

We all know what job he was hired to do. I'm not going to get into it

You know. We all know what Jack Smith was hired to do. He did his job

Well, on August 2nd, the day Trump was arraigned, Jack Smith's office called Carrick's office

for those papers again. So apparently they didn't read them the first time, because if they had, the attorney for

Mr. Carrick says those papers are absolutely exculpatory. That is a direct quote

Absolutely exculpatory for President Trump. Totally clear his name. Because in these papers, according to Carrick's attorney, we haven't independently reviewed

these papers, obviously. We're not privy to them. But according to Carrick's attorney, these papers show that Mr. Trump and Mr. Giuliani

all believed that there were shenanigans in the election. That the 2020 election was not right down the middle and everything was copacetic with it

That's what they believed. Whatever you believe, I believe, the other people believe is irrelevant to this

Because what Trump is being accused of is acting on the fact that he believed there

were shenanigans with the election. Well, if you're indicting him for it and you're saying he knew, he knew that what he was saying

is false. According to Carrick's attorneys, these papers prove that he did not know that what he was

saying was false. These papers show that he believed what he was saying was true

Again, whether it is true or not is completely irrelevant. This is a matter of did Trump knowingly do things when he actually knew the election

was fair and square. That's what this is all about. This is all about Jack Smith trying to get into Trump's head and know what he was thinking

Well, you kind of can't do that, Jack. But besides that, there seems to be a mounting mountain of evidence, growing and growing

that Trump actually believed that there was an issue with the election, that he actually

believed it in his heart and soul. So if that's the case, well, that's a big, huge hole in Jack Smith's case

It's a hole so big that it could sink the entire case because the entire case is predicated

on this. Without that, you don't really have anything. So Jack Smith, he's going to have a lot of explaining to do when he gets to court

I think he's not going to have it as easy as he thinks, especially if there's anybody

on that jury that doesn't just absolutely hate Trump, which, I mean, it's Washington

D.C., so that's iffy. But I imagine, look, defense attorneys have a say in the jury selection process as well

So hopefully it's a fair jury. And if it is, Smith's in a lot of trouble

Folks, let me know what you think on this story in the comments. Also, please like, share, and subscribe because, again, it really helps us out

I'm Carmine Sabia. This is Explain America. We love you guys. God bless you

Take care, everybody