Up next in 10
Explore Palantir's robust security features and defense against abuse. We discuss its civil liberties focus, financial success, and address New York Times criticisms. Learn why governments choose Palantir for secure, efficient solutions. #Palantir #DataSecurity #TechDebate #GovernmentContracts #Palantir #DataSecurity #TechDebate #GovernmentContracts #Cybersecurity #DataPrivacy #BigData #Innovation #TechNews #PalantirSecurity
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
You know, the Palanteer platform,
0:02
despite what you might read at the New
0:04
York Times, is actually the most secure,
0:07
the hardest platform in the world to
0:10
manipulate and change. Of course, any
0:13
technology can be abused. But if you
0:15
wanted to abuse a technology, if you
0:17
wanted to use the deep state to
0:19
unlawfully surveil people, the last
0:22
platform on the world you would pick is
0:24
Palanteer because of the granular way we
0:27
segment and put together and the
0:30
security models and the access control
0:31
models that are in Foundry natively, not
0:34
a built-on addendum. And by the way,
0:36
that focus on civil liberties is making
0:39
us really rich, which drives the woke
0:42
pagan religious practicing ne
0:45
Neanderthal thinking people who ignore
0:48
technology absolutely nut nuts on the
0:51
right and the left while we're building
0:52
D. By the way, I asked for permission
0:54
before I went nuts from our wonderful,
0:56
slightly conservative and highly
0:58
substantive partner and he gave me
1:00
permission to embarrass him. He didn't
1:02
realize it would be this embarrassing. I
1:03
think it comes with a These are my
1:05
views, not his. Okay, so Alex, let's get
1:07
into that. Um, New York Times has an
1:10
article. Here's the headline. Trump taps
1:12
Palunteer to compile data on Americans.
1:14
They paint a pretty Orwellian picture of
1:16
what you and the Trump administration
1:18
are doing. Over here, I picked a random
1:21
engineer and I said, "We have, by the
1:22
way, we have a contest. Find all the
1:25
technically absolutely erroneous things
1:27
in this article in 90 seconds." And I
1:29
picked a random engineer. He's like I
1:31
was like, "Well, how many do you think
1:32
you could do in 90 seconds?" He's like,
1:33
"Well, 15 20 for but but leaving aside
1:38
the technical look, it's probably hard
1:40
for them. I'm sure I'm Well, it's not
1:43
Well, first of all, on the tech side, it
1:46
is so ridiculous. I read the New York
1:48
Times. It's literally like I'm a
1:49
dyslexic. They might as well be hiring
1:51
me to do a spelling bee. So, and maybe
1:54
they just have friends who are tech
1:55
bros, but they can't hire on a
1:57
meritocratic basis. I don't know. So
1:59
that's up to them. We have a contest.
2:01
Find all the errors in 90 seconds. I
2:04
think somebody will find 50 or 60. But
2:06
the more important thing is we are not
2:09
surveilling Americans. We are not
2:11
building a database of surveillment. And
2:13
if you wanted to do that, the last
2:15
platform in the world you would buy is
2:17
Palanteer. And don't believe me, go
2:20
look, spend 10 minutes and look at the
2:24
architecture of our product. 10 minutes.
2:27
and then see how ridiculous that is. By
2:29
the way, writing ridiculous in a
2:32
highly charged environment is dangerous
2:35
and the New York Times should take
2:36
responsibility for the danger they're
2:38
putting out in the world. There really
2:40
are people who believe that crap. They
2:42
believe that. One thing that's true
2:45
though is that you have increased your
2:46
contracts with the government and that
2:49
has accelerated under the Trump
2:50
question. Of course we're but by the way
2:54
even there you know a mathematically
2:56
somewhat moderated liter person would
2:58
say okay well they're increasing a
2:59
government by 45%. That's pretty baller
3:01
how are they increasing in the US
3:03
commercial 71%. Huh? Are we building a
3:06
database to conspire against our own
3:08
people in the US commercial context with
3:10
no sales force? So it's it I mean yeah
3:13
we're winning. Yeah. Great. You know
3:15
what? Tell everybody we're winning. We
3:17
are winning. And by the way, we have a
3:19
rule of 83. Why we do it? Basically
3:20
means we don't have or have an basically
3:22
a net salesforce. And we're winning. And
3:24
we know why we're winning because the
3:26
product is the best in the world. And
3:28
you know what the Trump administration
3:30
is actually doing? Every other
3:32
government in the world is doing because
3:33
everyone wants to beat China who's not
3:35
China. Is buy the best product. What is
3:38
the best product? They're not buying our
3:39
product because they like me or they
3:40
like my speeches. Honestly, he's
3:43
wondering why he has to buy the product
3:44
from me, too. They buy it because I'm
3:47
going to make your company really,
3:50
really financially strong, more secure,
3:53
more efficient, increase the revenues.
3:55
Why does the Why does the US government
3:57
buy the product? First of all, it's a
3:58
product. It's not a waste of time,
3:59
service, BS thing that can be abused. By
4:02
the way, we lost so much revenue in the
4:04
last 20 years because people wanted to
4:06
buy things that could be abused. It's
4:08
really hard to abuse pounder. You could
4:09
do services. Who knows what a services
4:12
company is doing with your data? Or you
4:14
could do what the New York Time does or
4:16
consumer internet does. You could resell
4:18
the data and productize your users. By
4:20
the way, there's a high correlation
4:21
between productizing your users and
4:23
selling them woke pagan BS. That's a
4:26
good point. What are you doing at the
4:28
Can't get that with Palunteer, but you
4:29
can That was the IRS was one example. Uh
4:33
yeah, you know, we have so many
4:35
contracts in the US government. I mean,
4:37
I'll tell you what I without the
4:38
specifics, I can tell you exactly what
4:40
we're doing in the IRS. We're going to
4:42
use a very the most secure platform in
4:45
the world to make to replace inept
4:48
software with cheaper, better software
4:51
that is more efficient. That's what
4:52
we're doing. I assume at the IRS we have
4:55
so many contracts. I know that's what
4:57
we're doing here. That's what we're
4:58
doing with 71% of growth. You know what
5:00
we're doing in the DoD? We're scaring
5:01
the beeers, I'm trying not to use the f-
5:03
word, out of our adversaries by making
5:06
them scared at night. And you know how
5:08
we're doing it? By installing
5:09
productized software that runs
5:12
algorithms against data that's been
5:14
lawfully collected, and you can't
5:16
unlawfully use it in our platform, which
5:18
is one of the main reasons people buy it
5:20
and keep it.
5:22
All right. Uh Chris, we know