0:00
Thank you uh Mr. Acting Deputy
0:01
President. International globalist
0:03
organizations, tech giants, the UN, the
0:06
EU, and the World Economic Forum have
0:08
long advocated for centralized control
0:12
uh over the internet to combat
0:14
disinformation, hate speech, and cyber
0:16
threats. On the 24th of September this
0:19
year, the Stanford University's Cyber
0:21
Policy Center hosted a meeting entitled
0:24
Compliance and Enforcement in a Rapidly
0:26
Evolving Landscape attended by leaders
0:28
and officials from across the world. Now
0:30
the agenda was leaked to American
0:32
journalist Michael Shelonburgger and it
0:34
showed that the meeting's purpose was to
0:37
discuss the state of compliance and
0:39
enforcement and also to identify where
0:42
data research and expertise can enable
0:44
more effective compliance and
0:46
enforcement of existing policy. So the
0:48
top EU, UK, Brazil and Australian
0:51
officials meet in the US in September.
0:54
But to what end? Why did they hold this
0:56
meeting? What was its purpose? Well,
0:58
Congressman Jim Jordan, the chairman of
1:00
the House Committee of Judiciary uh in
1:02
the United States, certainly didn't hold
1:04
back when he wrote to the Stanford
1:05
Policy Center seeking documentations
1:07
relating to, and I quote, Stanford
1:09
University's cooperation and
1:11
coordination with foreign governments
1:12
seeking to censor American speech.
1:15
Congressman Jordan wrote further that
1:17
foreign censorship laws, regulations,
1:19
enforcement actions, and judicial orders
1:21
may have an effect or the effect of
1:24
limiting Americans ability to access
1:26
constitutionally protected speech in the
1:28
United States. In fact, this seems to be
1:31
the intended effect of many foreign
1:33
censorship efforts. Interesting. Also
1:36
interesting was that the lightning
1:38
keynote speaker at the meeting was our
1:41
own e safety commissioner, Julie Inman
1:43
Grant. So, why did the e-safety
1:46
commissioner attend this meeting?
