Wondering whether a turbocharged or naturally aspirated engine suits your driving style and needs? This video dives into the pros and cons of both engine types, comparing performance, fuel efficiency, maintenance, and reliability. Learn how turbochargers boost power by forcing extra air into the engine, while naturally aspirated engines offer simplicity and immediate throttle response. Perfect for car enthusiasts, DIY mechanics, or anyone shopping for a new vehicle looking to understand these key engine differences.
Show More Show Less View Video Transcript
0:00
Your car is feeling a little sluggish
0:01
and you're wondering, should I get a
0:03
turbo next time or just stick with a
0:05
regular engine? Let's talk about it. I'm
0:07
Tom. This is Car Justify, and today
0:09
we're breaking down turbocharged versus
0:11
naturally aspirated engines. What they
0:13
actually mean, how they behave, and
0:15
which one's going to be a better fit for
0:17
you. Now, if you've ever driven a car
0:19
that suddenly pulls harder when you hit
0:21
the gas, chances are that thing's got a
0:23
turbo. Turbos are great for squeezing
0:25
out extra power, especially in smaller
0:27
engines, but they're not always the
0:29
answer for every driver. I've had folks
0:31
come in with turbo cars expecting race
0:33
car performance, and then wonder why it
0:35
feels jumpy in traffic. So, let's start
0:37
by looking at what makes a turbocharged
0:39
engine tick. A turbo works by using the
0:42
exhaust gases, yeah, the stuff that
0:44
normally just shoots out your tailpipe
0:45
to spin a turbine. That turbine then
0:47
compresses the air going into your
0:49
engine. More air means more power.
0:51
Sounds cool, right? and it is, but it
0:53
also means you've got more moving parts.
0:55
And more parts, more chances something
0:58
breaks. I've replaced turbo actuators,
1:00
wastegates, boost solenoids, you name
1:03
it. So, if you're planning to keep the
1:05
car a long time, that's something to
1:06
keep in mind. Now, compare that to a
1:08
naturally aspirated engine. No turbo, no
1:11
supercharger, just good old-fashioned
1:12
air flow. It's simpler, easier to work
1:15
on, and usually a bit more predictable.
1:17
What you feel under your foot is what
1:18
the engine's doing. No delay, no
1:20
surprises. This is the kind of engine I
1:22
recommend for folks who don't want to
1:24
worry about extra maintenance or live in
1:26
hot climates where turbos tend to get a
1:28
little cranky. That being said, turbos
1:30
have come a long way. Fuel economy is a
1:32
big reason manufacturers love them. A
1:34
little 1.5 L turbo can deliver the same
1:37
power as a 2.4 L non-turbo, but with
1:40
better mileage. If you're commuting a
1:42
lot and want some pep without guzzling
1:44
gas, that combo can really work. But
1:46
just know that in stopand go traffic or
1:48
if you're towing anything heavy, turbos
1:50
can feel a bit overworked. I've had
1:52
folks tow small trailers with their
1:54
turbo cars and come in asking why the
1:56
engine feels strained. It's just not
1:58
built for that kind of constant load.
2:00
Another thing, turbo lag. That's the
2:02
slight delay between hitting the gas and
2:04
feeling the power. Some newer cars have
2:06
pretty much eliminated it, but it's
2:08
still there. It's not dangerous or
2:10
anything, just something to get used to.
2:12
I had a buddy trade in his naturally
2:13
aspirated V6 for a turbo four-cylinder
2:16
and he kept saying it feels fast
2:19
eventually. Made me laugh, but he's not
2:21
wrong. If you're into mods and tuning,
2:24
turbocharged engines give you way more
2:26
room to play. You can crank up the
2:28
boost, reflash the ECU, add an
2:31
intercooler. Sky's the limit. Naturally
2:34
aspirated engines, not so much. You'll
2:37
need serious hardware changes to get
2:39
more horsepower. And even then, gains
2:41
are usually small. So, if you're the
2:44
type who likes to tinker on weekends,
2:46
turbo might be your playground. On the
2:48
flip side, if you're looking for
2:49
reliability and you're not chasing
2:51
power, naturally aspirated is hard to
2:53
beat. Fewer components, fewer failure
2:56
points, and generally longer lifespans
2:58
if you keep up with oil changes and
3:00
basic maintenance. A lot of older
3:02
Toyotas and Hondas, still running strong
3:04
today, are naturally aspirated and they
3:06
just keep going. All right, so let's
3:09
wrap this up. If you want more power
3:10
from a smaller engine, better fuel
3:12
economy, and don't mind the occasional
3:14
repair bill down the line, turbo is a
3:16
solid bet. If you prefer simple,
3:18
reliable, and a more natural throttle
3:20
feel, go naturally aspirated. Either
3:23
way, make sure the engine matches how
3:25
you drive. That's the real key. Hope
3:28
this helped clear things up a bit. If it
3:30
did, go ahead and hit that like button.
3:31
Maybe subscribe if you want more
3:33
straight talk car tips. I'm Tom from Car
3:35
Justify. See you next time.
#Custom & Performance Vehicles

