Qwen Image | Game changer in AI Art
Aug 16, 2025
Try Qwen Image on LanHive - https://lanhive.com
View Video Transcript
0:00
Quinn image is described as a gamecher
0:02
for AI art and general image generation.
0:05
But is it really? Today I'm putting it
0:08
to the ultimate test to see if it stacks
0:11
up to the expectations. We're going to
0:13
see how well it sticks to prompts, how
0:16
good its native text pretty is, how well
0:18
it generates the images of realistic
0:21
people, and whether it's worthy the
0:23
cost. Let's get started. To get started,
0:26
I'll choose create photos. Once we are
0:29
here, we can choose Quinn from these
0:31
number of models that are here. So just
0:33
scroll down and we have Quen image here.
0:37
Then for the image size, I'll choose
0:38
this landscape ratio so that we can see
0:41
it proper. Then to get started, we're
0:43
going to test the prompt lance of Quinn.
0:46
We want to see how well this model
0:48
follows instructions. So we're going to
0:50
do two tests for promptance. The first
0:53
one is this. I'll just paste it here. So
0:56
when you read through this prompt, I'm
0:58
sure you already have the picture. Now
1:00
we want to see if the picture that we
1:01
have in mind is similar to what the
1:04
model is going to generate. So once
1:06
you're okay with all your settings, we
1:08
can just hit generate.
1:10
Okay, we have the results there. And
1:12
this is very good. We can see that it
1:14
followed the prompt exactly. We had the
1:17
two tables here. The woman in the B
1:19
court, the bicycle in lead, the leaning
1:22
against the wall. And this is very good
1:24
except for this table. It doesn't have
1:26
the newspaper. But we can see that this
1:28
follows the prompt very very closely
1:31
which is very good. I'll give it a 9 out
1:33
of 10 for this specific image. Let's try
1:36
a different prompt. Okay. I've just
1:38
paste in a different prompt here. Again
1:40
I have my own imagination and I want to
1:42
see this will be very close to the image
1:44
that the AI will generate. Once you're
1:47
okay with everything we can click
1:48
generate again. We have the results
1:51
here. Again, this is spot on. Everything
1:54
that we described in the prompt is here.
1:57
This is very good adherance to the
1:59
prompt. I'd actually give this one a 10
2:01
out of 10 because everything I've said
2:03
in the prompt, I can see it here. This
2:06
is very good. So, I can say Quinn passes
2:09
the prompt test here. It follows
2:11
everything very well. Let's move on to
2:14
text. So, Quinn is built to excel at
2:17
text. It's one of the selling point of
2:19
Quinn. So let's give it a try here.
2:22
We'll try to see if it lives up to the
2:24
expectation. So here I'm asking you to
2:26
design a wedding card which is
2:28
textheavy. So we're testing for design
2:30
and we are specifically interested in
2:32
the text that it's going to generate. So
2:34
this is the prompt that I have here. By
2:37
the way, if you're interested in all
2:38
this prompt that I've used, I'll share
2:40
them in the description below. So we
2:42
have our prompt here. Let's hit generate
2:44
to see what will happen.
2:47
Wow, look at that. This is brilliant.
2:50
This is good. Except for this one here.
2:52
You can see it's not readable, but the
2:55
rest is good. Exactly what we gave it
2:58
and it has done the design. This is
3:00
excellent. So, if you have no design
3:02
skills and you want to make a wedding
3:04
card, invitation card or something like
3:06
that, I think this is a good model to
3:08
pick up. So, this is exactly what we
3:10
prompted for except for this one here.
3:13
So, I'd give it a 9 out of 10. Very good
3:16
results here. Many image generating
3:18
models would struggle with this. So,
3:20
let's try a different prompt, but we are
3:22
still testing how well it generates
3:24
text. So, here I've tested the prompt.
3:27
You can see there's a lot going on here.
3:29
The text we're interested in is this one
3:32
here and also this. Not just the text,
3:34
but how it's rendered. So, this one
3:36
should be written on a wooden sign,
3:38
while this one should be written on a
3:40
chalkboard and it should be handwritten.
3:42
So, let's see how it does with this one.
3:45
Okay, we have the results. This is good
3:48
except that this is not written on the
3:50
top board. So, the board is here. We
3:53
expected this to have been written here,
3:55
but this is okay. Everything else was
3:57
followed. I'll say this is an 8 out of
4:00
10. So, we can surely see that Quinn
4:02
does very well with text. So, let's move
4:04
on to see how it works with the images
4:06
of people. Now, we have this prompt here
4:09
and we expect to see three people in the
4:11
image. So, each of the person is doing
4:13
something different. And so we can see
4:15
one person is wearing sunglasses and
4:17
blasting. The second person is glinging
4:19
with their hands while speaking and the
4:21
third person is drinking from a glass of
4:23
iced tea. So many models struggle with
4:25
fingers and also the image as a lot of
4:28
people. Let's see how Quinn does here.
4:30
So just hit generate. And we have the
4:33
results here. Wonderful. This is good.
4:36
Let's look at the fingers. The fingers
4:38
are fine. I think everything is okay
4:40
here. In my mind, the picture I was
4:42
having is that all of them will be men.
4:44
But this is very good. I'll take nothing
4:47
away from it. I'll give it a 10 out of
4:49
10. Let's try a different prompt. So,
4:51
another thing that AI struggles with is
4:53
when someone is in motion or in action
4:55
of some sort. It may be running,
4:57
jumping, or anything like that. So,
4:59
that's what we want to test here. So
5:01
far, Quinn has proved to be very good
5:03
for image generation. Let's see how it
5:05
knows this one. We have the results
5:07
here. This is very very close to what we
5:10
asked for. There's only one problem. You
5:12
can see the running doesn't look very
5:14
realistic. I think even at first glance,
5:17
you can say that this image is AI
5:19
generated. And for that, I'll give it an
5:21
8 out of 10. Everything else is spot on
5:24
and it's very good. Lastly, let's look
5:26
at the cost or the pricing of this
5:28
model. So, I'll go back to the models
5:30
here. And by comparison, we can see that
5:33
GPT1 here needs 30 credits. tracks needs
5:36
20 10 we have two here let's scroll down
5:39
to Quinn and Quinn needs only five so
5:42
when we're comparing it to other models
5:44
here you can see it's one of the
5:46
cheapest it's the same with imagin only
5:49
this version of flax is cheaper than
5:51
quen so to be able to get all these
5:54
features for this course I think it's a
5:56
very good deal I would highly recommend
5:58
Quinn to any person who is interested in
6:00
air image generation you get good text
6:03
rendering good prompted balance, good
6:06
images of people, and the cost is very
6:08
low. So, let me know what your thoughts
6:10
are on Quinn image in the comment
6:12
section below. And if you want to see
6:14
how you can make lip syncing videos with
6:16
AI, that video is up here. I'll see you
6:19
over there.